Sports are sexist!
An even playing field… Equal opportunities… A fair shot…
All of the above would be fair expectations of how people should be treated. There are so many examples of how sports are great at transcending the gap between competition and life. One place sports has failed to transcend that gap is in how it still in 2015, sport “protects” the female sex and changes rules, judges them differently and restricts them from being equals on the sporting landscape.
Tennis is a prime example of one of those sports… In grand slam events (the 4 events with the most money, prestige and rankings points available on the calendar year) women play best out of 3 sets, men play best out of 5 sets. In 2007, Wimbledon and the French Open joined the other Grand Slam tournaments in offering equal prize money for both sexes. It has raised quite a debate in whether this is fair, and whether the women should join their men’s counterparts in playing 5 sets at grand slams. It would change women’s tennis competition forever, and it could make the physical aspect of tennis become a huge influence on who wins the big tournaments.
Interestingly there were lots of calls for tennis to make the equality move in 2007, but since then we have not heard the same calls to make the matches of equal length. By nature the fact that the governing bodies have women play less is sexist, arguably more sexist than the prize money being different for less work. My question to you as you read this is why was there so much outcry for equal pay, without equal exertion? Do we think that the focus of that change was wrong? The issue divides the players, many of the men have voiced their issue that the women do not have to exert themselves as much, and are paid equal money. Others chose to stay out of the issue. The fact is that in tennis we corrected the money issue without addressing the real equality issue, women are happy to earn the same amount, but they are also happy to play less in the big tournaments. Why doesn’t women’s grand slam tennis run to five sets? It can’t be a question of stamina, surely? Women run in marathons and they do triathlons (iron mans too), and the quality of the women’s game is rising all the time. The best argument I can find is that women length of match does not necessarily mean quality of match, I 100% agree with this idea, but down the stretch in the grand slams it would be nice to see the matches be about all aspects of tennis, fitness included.
With tennis being put aside, I do believe there are examples in most sports where we instinctively are sexist. Here is one to get you thinking…
March Madness brackets… ever filled out one for the women’s NCAA champs?